Types of Nuclear Reactors: Exploring Nuclear Power Plants
2 minute readDiscover the different types of nuclear power plants and how they work
Home > Learning Center > Energy Production > The Advantages and Disadvantages of Coal as an Energy Source
6 minute read • Graham Lumley • Last update April 2024
We’ve all heard about coal energy – good and bad. But what is coal energy, and how does it fit into our daily lives? In this article, we’ll take a closer look at coal energy, how it works, and how it impacts our environment.
Coal accounted for 19.5% of the electricity generated in the United States in 2022, down from 42% in 2014. In 2021, coal supplied 9.5 quadrillion British thermal units (2,800 TWh) of primary energy to electric power plants, which made up 90% of coal’s contribution to the U.S. energy supply. Utilities buy more than 90% of the coal consumed in the United States. There were over 200 coal-powered units across the United States in 2022. Coal plants have been closing since the 2010s due to cheaper and cleaner natural gas and renewables.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that coal will account for 13% of electricity generation in 2050. This decline is due to a number of factors, including the continued rise of natural gas and renewable energy, the implementation of environmental regulations, and the closure of coal-fired power plants.
Coal is the most common fuel used to generate electricity in the United States. Coal-fired power plants burn coal to heat water, which turns into steam and drives a turbine to generate electricity. It’s also used to heat iron ore in blast furnaces in order to make steel and to produce chemicals like ammonia.
Some homes are heated by coal via coal-fired boilers that heat water and circulate heat through a system of pipes.
Coal is the second-largest energy source in the U.S. for electricity generation (around 22%). A few coal-fire plants convert coal to a gas which can be used in gas turbines to generate power; others use steam turbines.
Coal power stations, also known as coal-fired power plants or coal plants, are facilities that generate electricity by burning coal. They are large industrial complexes designed to efficiently convert the energy stored in coal into electrical energy.
As of 2023, there are 224 operational coal-fired power stations in the United States. These plants have a total capacity of 256 gigawatts (G.W.), which is about 19% of the country’s total electricity-generating capacity.
Burning coal in power plants leads to the release of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, which contribute to climate change.
Coal-fired power plants use technologies like “scrubbers” to remove pollutants from their emissions before they are released through smokestacks. However, the smoke still contains nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter (like soot), and heavy metals such as mercury, which can impact air quality and human health, even at considerable distances from the power plants.
Due to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan and the low cost of natural gas, older coal plants are closing, and interest in new coal plants is declining.
Burning coal releases a lot of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere, contributing to global warming. To address this issue, scientists are developing new technologies that aim to reduce or eliminate CO2 emissions. However, these technologies are expensive and energy-intensive, so it’s unsure whether they will be viable in the future.
Some existing methods to make coal cleaner include washing it to reduce emissions of ash and sulfur dioxide when burned, using electrostatic precipitators and fabric filters to remove fly ash from flue gasses, and employing flue gas desulfurization to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions. Low-NOx burners, re-burning techniques, and selective catalytic reduction can also help reduce nitrogen oxide emissions. Newer coal plants are more efficient, producing fewer emissions per unit of electricity generated. Advanced technologies like integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) and pressurized fluidized bed combustion (PFBC) can further increase efficiency.
There are also efforts to produce ultra-clean coal (UCC) with very low levels of ash and sulfur, which could be used as fuel in large marine engines. Gasification and sequestration technologies are being explored as well.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a key aspect of ‘clean coal,’ involving capturing CO2 and storing it underground. Several methods exist for capturing CO2, but they are not yet optimized for large-scale coal power plants.
Early developments in carbon capture and storage (CCS) focused on capturing CO2 emissions from a single source and storing them in a specific location. However, as economies of scale became important, the focus shifted to creating hubs that collect, dehydrate, and transport CO2 from multiple sources. Currently, there are around 15 such hubs being established.
The Northern Lights Project in the North Sea, led by Equinor, Shell, and Total, is one of the most advanced hubs. It gathers CO2 emissions from various plants, initially around 0.8 million tonnes per year and later increasing to about 5 million tonnes per year. The CO2 is compressed, liquefied, and transported by dedicated ships to a storage site. The project aims to start operating in 2024.
Coal production and usage have slowed down as cleaner and more affordable alternatives for generating electricity have emerged. Although this transition away from coal can be challenging for communities that rely on coal mines and plants, it is crucial to mitigate the severe impacts associated with coal.
When coal is burned, it releases various harmful pollutants into the air, such as mercury, lead, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulates. These pollutants are linked to health issues like asthma, respiratory problems, heart diseases, cancer, neurological disorders, and premature death. Although the Environmental Protection Agency has set emission limits, many power plants lack the necessary pollution controls, and the future of these protections remains uncertain.
Coal mining and power plants have significant effects on water sources. Coal ash, similar to the ash from a charcoal grill, is produced in large quantities by coal-fired power plants, with over 100 million tons generated annually. A considerable portion of this waste ends up in landfills, ponds, lakes, and other sites, posing a risk of water contamination over time. Coal mining also leads to acid rock drainage, destruction of mountain streams and valleys through mountaintop removal mining, and conflicts over water resources when coal plants rely heavily on local water supplies.
One of the most serious long-term global impacts of coal usage is its contribution to climate change. When coal is burned, it releases carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that traps heat in the atmosphere. This leads to adverse consequences such as droughts, rising sea levels, floods, extreme weather events, and loss of species. The severity of these impacts is directly related to the amount of carbon dioxide emitted, including from coal plants. In the U.S., coal power plants account for roughly one-quarter of energy-related carbon emissions.
One sustainable alternative to coal is natural gas. Natural gas is a cleaner burning fossil fuel compared to coal, emitting fewer pollutants and greenhouse gasses when burned. It produces lower levels of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter, which contribute to air pollution and respiratory issues. Natural gas combustion releases fewer carbon dioxide emissions, resulting in reduced contributions to climate change.
Natural gas can be used as a transition fuel in the shift towards renewable energy sources. It can complement intermittent renewable energy generation, such as wind and solar, by providing a reliable and flexible source of power for electricity generation. Natural gas power plants can quickly ramp up or down their output, helping to stabilize the electrical grid when renewable energy production fluctuates.
Renewable energy sources provide sustainable alternatives to coal. These sources harness energy from natural processes such as sunlight, wind, water, and heat from the Earth’s core. They produce clean electricity without emitting greenhouse gasses or contributing to air pollution.
Nuclear power generates electricity through controlled nuclear reactions. It produces significant amounts of energy without greenhouse gas emissions. However, the use of nuclear power raises concerns about the safe disposal of radioactive waste and the potential for accidents, making it a controversial option.
Biomass energy utilizes organic materials such as wood, agricultural waste, or dedicated energy crops to produce heat or electricity. Biomass can be burned directly or converted into biofuels like ethanol and biodiesel. When sustainably sourced, biomass energy can be carbon-neutral since the carbon emitted during combustion is absorbed by newly grown plants.
Yes, there are alternative uses for coal besides power generation. Coal can be used in various industrial processes, including steel production, cement manufacturing, and chemical production. Coal can also be converted into synthetic gasses or liquid fuels through processes like coal gasification or coal liquefaction. However, these alternative uses of coal still have environmental implications, and efforts are being made to explore cleaner and more sustainable alternatives for these industrial processes.
The transportation and storage of coal are essential components of the overall energy supply chain. Coal is typically transported via trains, trucks, or ships from mining sites to power plants or other end-users. This transportation process requires infrastructure, including rail lines, ports, and storage facilities. The transportation and storage of coal can have environmental impacts, such as the release of dust and pollutants during transportation or the potential for accidents or spills. Proper management, regulation, and investment in infrastructure are necessary to mitigate these impacts.
Coal energy has historically played a significant role in the economy and job creation, particularly in regions with abundant coal reserves. Coal mining and the operation of coal-fired power plants have provided employment opportunities in the mining, energy production, and related industries. However, as the energy landscape shifts towards cleaner alternatives, job prospects in the coal sector have faced challenges. Economic diversification and transition strategies are being explored to support affected communities and facilitate the development of alternative industries.
Coal energy is generally not considered a sustainable source of power in the long term due to its significant environmental impact and finite nature. Coal is a non-renewable resource, and its extraction depletes natural reserves over time. Moreover, coal combustion emits greenhouse gasses and contributes to air pollution and climate change. The increasing global focus on sustainable and low-carbon energy solutions has led to efforts to reduce coal dependency and transition towards cleaner alternatives.
The global demand for coal energy remains significant, although it varies among regions. Coal has historically been a dominant energy source, particularly in developing countries where industrialization and electricity demand are high. The demand for coal is expected to decline in the future due to efforts to transition to cleaner energy sources and address climate change concerns. The shift towards renewable energy, policy changes, and increasing focus on reducing carbon emissions are influencing the future trajectory of coal demand.
Coal energy differs significantly from renewable energy sources in terms of environmental impact and sustainability. Unlike renewable sources like solar, wind, or hydropower, coal is a fossil fuel that emits significant amounts of greenhouse gasses when burned, contributing to climate change. Coal mining can have adverse effects on land, water quality, and ecosystems. Renewable energy sources, on the other hand, produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions during operation and have a much lower environmental footprint.
Yes, there are regulations and measures in place to mitigate the environmental effects of coal energy. Many countries have implemented air pollution control technologies and emission standards for coal-fired power plants to reduce the release of pollutants such as sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter. Environmental regulations often require the implementation of technologies like flue gas desulfurization and electrostatic precipitators to reduce emissions. Some countries also have regulations for coal mining to minimize the environmental impact on land, water, and ecosystems.
Going back to our earlier question: what is coal energy? It’s not a sustainable energy source for the future, even though it’s so widely used. While scientists and engineers are hard at work to ensure that coal is as clean as possible, the current solutions are still very expensive and not economically viable. Instead, we have to look at alternatives that are affordable but cleaner-burning.
Currently, coal remains a significant contributor to global electricity generation, accounting for a little over one-third of the total. It also plays a vital role in industries like iron and steel. However, as we strive towards achieving the IEA’s Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario, it is crucial to transition away from unabated coal generation by 2040.
To align with the Net Zero by 2050 Scenario, we must aim for an annual average reduction of approximately 8% in emissions from coal-fired power plants until 2030. This reduction is necessary to stay on track and meet our emissions targets. In order for coal to have a place as a cleaner energy source in the future, governments and the coal industry must collaborate to develop and deploy technologies that are less polluting and more efficient.
Discover the different types of nuclear power plants and how they work
Electricity has a fascinating and complex history that stretches back far beyond the modern era. From the ancient Greeks who discovered static electricity to the scientific revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries that unveiled its true potential, the journey of electricity is a tale of curiosity, experimentation, and groundbreaking…
Texans can save up to
$500 per year
by switching to BKV Energy.
Explore affordable electricity plans.